Final Digression
In the final (digression) analysis
Printed documents are supposed to have begininngs, middles, and, most
definitively
endings that separate them from other documents. In the world of print,
texts must be clearly segmented by physical endpoints (e.g., the back cover
of a book) and conceptual endpoints (e.g., the often unimaginative
"summary
and conclusions" sections at the end of academic articles; see Bolter,
1991, for a discussion of the interplay between what he calls the hard
and soft structures of various writing technologies). I will conform to
that convention here, which is a somewhat welcome concession to the conventions
of print-based writing because it has been a struggle to decide what
digressions
and connections to include and which to omit, knowing as I wrote that an
endpoint is expected and inevitable. And, perhaps my choices have been
too digressionary.
[The following paragraph followed by my e-mail signature file was the ending
of the published article in The Reading Teacher on which the current
hypertext
is based. The final text of the printed article refers to the hypertext
you are reading now. If you think you know how I was going to complete
the interrupted sentence, e-mail me with your idea and I'll respond.]
So, in closing, I wish to point out in this final digression what is
singularly,
especially from this writer's point of view, the greatest advantage of
electronic reading and writing compared to printed forms. It is an advantage
so strongly supported by my own research and by instructional practice
that it is incontrovertible and must be taken into account by any educator
who undertakes to understand the implications of technology on literacy.
This critical advantage I am referring to is of course [THE EDITORS REGRET
TO INFORM READERS THAT DUE TO STRICT SPACE LIMITATIONS, WE COULD NOT PUBLISH
THE REMAINDER OF REINKING'S ARTICLE. THOSE READERS WHO WISH TO
READ THE REMAINDER OF HIS ARTICLE MAY ACCESS IT SOON IN READING ONLINE,
IRA'S NEW ELECTRONIC JOURNAL, WHERE SPACE LIMITATIONS ARE LESS CRITICAL.]
Return to main menu.
Reading Online, www.readingonline.org
Posted May 1997
© 1997-2000 International Reading Association, Inc. ISSN 1096-1232