Abstract  |  Background  |  Methods  |  Reasons  |  Activities  |  Professional Development  |  Reflections  |   References



References

Au, K.H., & Raphael, T.E. (2000). Equity and literacy in the next millennium. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 170-188. Available (retrieved June 1, 2002): www.catchword.com/ira/00340553/v35n1/contp1-1.htm
Back to “Reasons”

Balester, V., Halasek, K., & Peterson, N. (1992). Sharing authority: Collaborative teaching in a computer-based writing course. Computers and Composition, 9(3), 25-39.
Back to “Activities”

Barrie, J.M., & Presti, D.E. (1996). Enhanced: The World Wide Web as an instructional tool. Science, (274), 371-372.
Back to “Activities”

Becker, H.J. (1999). Internet use by teachers (Rep. no. 1, Teaching, learning, and computing: 1998). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine. Available (retrieved June 1, 2002): www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/findings/internet-use/startpage.htm
Back to “Methods”

Becker, H.J. (2000). Internet use by teachers. In R.D. Pea (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass reader on technology and learning (pp. 80-111). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Back to “Reasons”

Blanchard, J. (1996). Issues in technology and literacy education. In R.D. Robinson, M.C. McKenna, & J.M. Wedman (Eds.), Issues and trends in literacy education (pp. 316-326). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Back to “Background”

Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. (1998). The CIERA survey of early literacy programs in high performing schools: Teacher survey. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement, University of Michigan.
Back to “Methods”

CEO Forum on Education and Technology. (2000). Power of digital learning: Integrating digital content. Washington, DC: Author.
Back to “Activities”

Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Back to “Activities”

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2000). A parent’s guide to Internet safety. Washington, DC: Author. Available (retrieved June 1, 2002): www.fbi.gov/publications/pguide/pguide.htm
Back to “Activities”

Finders, M.J. (1997). Just girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high. New York: Teachers College Press.
Back to “Activities”

Garner, R., & Gillingham, M.G. (1998). The Internet in the classroom: Is it the end of transmission-oriented pedagogy? In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology (pp. 221-231). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Back to “Reasons”

Geisler, C. (1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise: Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Back to “Activities”

Gilster, P. (2000). Digital literacy. In R.D. Pea (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass reader on technology and learning (pp. 215-225). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Back to “Activities”

Hawisher, G.E. (1990). Content knowledge versus process knowledge: A false dichotomy. In G.E. Hawisher & A.O. Soter (Eds.), On literacy and its teaching (pp. 1-18). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Back to “Activities”

Heller, R.S. (1990). The role of hypermedia in education: A look at the research issues. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(4), 431-441.
Back to “Activities”

International Society for Technology in Education. (1999). National educational technology standards for students. Eugene, OR: Author.
Back to “Methods”

International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). National educational technology standards for teachers. Eugene, OR: Author.
Back to “Methods”

Joram, E., Woodruff, E., Bryson, M., & Lindsay, P.H. (1992). The effects of revising with a word processor on written composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(2), 167-192.
Back to “Activities”

Kamil, M.L., & Intrator, S. (1997, December). Trends in publication of research on technology and reading, writing, and literacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.
Back to “Activities”

Lawrence, S., & Giles, C.L. (1999, July 8). Accessibility of information on the Web. Nature, 400(6740), 107-109.
Back to “Activities”

Leu, D.J., Jr., & Kinzer, C.K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 108-127. Available (retrieved June 1, 2002): www.catchword.com/ira/00340553/v35n1/contp1-1.htm
Back to “Background”

Murnane, R., & Levy, F. (1996). Teaching the new basic skills: Principles for educating children to thrive in a changing economy. New York: Free Press.
Back to “Reasons”

National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Available (retrieved June 1, 2002): nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2001071
Back to “Background”

National Council of Teachers of English and International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Urbana, IL, and Newark, DE: Authors.
Back to “Methods”

National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1999a, July). Fact sheet: Education: Boosting the odds for Internet use. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Available (retrieved June 1, 2002): www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/digitaldivide/factsheets/education.htm
Back to “Reasons”

National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1999b, July). Falling through the Net: Defining the digital divide: A report on the telecommunications and information technology gap in America. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Available (PDF document, retrieved June 1, 2002): www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/FTTN.pdf
Back to “Reasons”

Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2000). The snapshot survey service: Assessing teachers’ and administrators’ technology activities, beliefs and needs. Denton, TX: University of North Texas.
Back to “Methods”

Owston, R.D., Murphy, S., Wideman, H.H. (1992). The effects of word processing on students’ writing quality and revision strategies. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(3), 249-276.
Back to “Activities”

President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology: Panel on Educational Technology. (1997, March). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Washington, DC: Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President of the United States. Available (retrieved June 1, 2002): www.ostp.gov/PCAST/k-12ed.html
Back to “Background”

Probst, R.E. (1990). Literature and literacy. In G.E. Hawisher & A.O. Soter (Eds.), On literacy and its teaching (pp. 100-110). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Back to “Activities”

Reinking, D., & Bridwell-Bowles, L. (1996). Computers in reading and writing. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 310-340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Back to “Background”

Riel, M. (2000, September). New designs for connected teaching and learning. White paper presented at the Secretary’s Conference on Educational Technology, U.S. Department of Education. Available (retrieved June 1, 2002): www.gse.uci.edu/mriel/whitepaper/learning.html
Back to “Background”

Riel, M., & Harasim, L. (1994). Research perspectives on network learning. Machine-Mediated Learning, 4(2/3), 91-114.
Back to “Activities”

Romiszowski, A. (1997). The use of telecommunication in education. In S. Dijkstra, N. Seel, F. Schott, & R.D. Tennyson (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives (Vol. 2: Solving instructional design problems, pp. 183-220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Back to “Activities”

Selfe, C.L., & Hilligoss, S. (Eds.). (1994). Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. New York: Modern Language Association of America.
Back to “Background”

Shapiro, N.S., & Levine, J.H. (1999). Creating learning communities: A practical guide to winning support, organizing for change, and implementing programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Back to “Professional Development”

Shepard, L.A. (2000, April 26). Presidential address. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Back to “Professional Development”

Wood, F.H., & McQuarrie, F. (1999, Summer). On-the-job learning. Journal of Staff Development, 20(30), 10-13.
Back to “Professional Development”



Abstract  |  Background  |  Methods  |  Reasons  |  Activities  |  Professional Development  |  Reflections  |   References



From “Literacy Learning on the Net: An Exploratory Study,” by M.L. McNabb, B. Hassel, & L. Steiner
Reading Online, June 2002
© 2002 North Central Regional Educational Laboratory