Web Watch:
Internet Resources to Assist Teachers with Struggling Readers
|
Every day, a wide range of children come together in classrooms to learn. They represent rich cultural, linguistic, racial, ethnic, and economic diversity. Some have special needs resulting from sources such as speech, visual, or hearing impairments, emotional disturbances, autism, developmental delays, or giftedness. For some of these children, reading acquisition will be easy, and for others it will be difficult. The unique individuals within each classroom together create a unique learning community. It is the needs of all children in the community that influence the teaching and learning of literacy in the classroom. The role of the teacher is critical in ensuring that all children are successful readers. How do teachers design instruction to meet the needs of all students? First and most important, teachers must believe that all children can learn to read. Because our attitudes and expectations permeate instruction, believing that all children can become readers is the first step in creating an effective literacy program and developing a community that respects the unique qualities of each child. Communicating high expectations to all children will enhance their potential for success. |
Related Posting from the Archives
|
Teachers must also be knowledgeable about effective instructional practices that meet the diverse needs of students and that take into account the prior knowledge, experiences, and home languages each child brings to the classroom. We must create learning environments that support cognitive, language, and social development through authentic learning activities relevant to childrens lives. Yet, even if we create an optimal classroom environment, some of our students will experience great difficulty with accurate, fluent, thoughtful reading. What would really make a difference for these students? What really matters for struggling readers?
Lots of Reading with Just Right Books
In his aptly-titled What Really Matters for Struggling Readers: Designing Research-Based Programs, Richard Allington (2001) states,
In learning to read it is true that reading practice -- just reading -- is a powerful contributor to the development of accurate, fluent, high comprehension reading. In fact, if I were required to select a single aspect of the instructional environment to change, my first choice would be creating a schedule that supported dramatically increased quantities of reading during the school day. (p. 24)
Allington recommends a minimum of 90 minutes of in-school reading per day. At first, this may seem impossible to realize -- theres already not enough time to teach everything! But take a careful look at how much of the school day is spent on noninstructional activity -- opening and ending procedures, intercom announcements, and paperwork. With some improvements in organizational efficiency, it may be possible to find 30 to 50 minutes for reading every day.
Allington (2001) goes on to state that once the volume of reading has increased, it is important to make sure children are reading books that are just right. In many school districts, it is common for teachers to be provided with a single basal, textbook, or trade book for reading instruction, regardless of her students diverse reading levels and interests. This practice increases the likelihood of many children reading material that is too difficult and that consequently fails to promote reading development and positive attitudes toward reading. In order to optimize learning, we must provide children with texts that are just right -- in other words, books that match students reading levels and interests.
Of course, this is no small task. Providing children with lots of books at the appropriate levels can be overwhelming. How does a teacher determine each childs appropriate reading level? How does he know the reading level of individual books? And, finally, how does he ensure that children have access to enough books?
Lets take a look at each of these questions in turn, and see what help the Internet has to offer.
Determining a Childs Reading Level
One simple way to ascertain how well a child is reading is through observation. As Allington (2001) suggests,
Look around the classroom during a silent reading period. Are there children whose bodies, faces, or even fingers provide signs of frustration? Are there kids who seem to be wandering -- mentally or physically -- when they should be reading? Do some kids have the book close to their face, brow furrowed, and finger-stabbing at the words? Do some kids turn the page much less often than others -- or at all? If this is a 3-6 classroom, can you hear subvocalizing? Observe much lip movement and finger following of the text? (p. 52)
Another way is to listen to individual children read and record their difficulties with a technique such as running records. While the child reads aloud, the teacher places a check mark over each word read correctly; when the child makes an error, he jots down what the child actually said above the words on the printed page. Dividing the number of words in the text by the number of miscues yields an accuracy percentage. The text is considered easy for the child if she read with 95 to 100 percent accuracy, instructional if read with 90 to 94 percent accuracy, and hard if read with 80 to 89 percent accuracy.
An accuracy percentage can also be determined with the Assessment Calculator at the ReadWriteSite. With this unique online resource, the teacher simply enters the number of running words in the text, the number of errors made by the child, and the number of self-corrections. With a click of a button, the error rate, accuracy rate, and self-correction rate are instantly calculated. There is also a place to enter the childs name, grade level, title of the story, assessors name, and comments, all of which can be printed along with the calculated information for documentation.
The ReadWriteSite also hosts the Level Estimator. With this tool, the assessor selects the childs grade level from a pull-down menu (e.g., first grade early [Sept.-Dec.]; fourth grade mid [Jan.-Mar]; seventh grade late [April-June]) which results in display of a short passage with a picture for the child to read. Messages advise the assessor to print the page so that errors can be marked as the child reads from the screen; a scale for determination of the childs level of comprehension is also provided. After the child has finished reading, the assessor enters the number of errors and an accuracy percentage is calculated, along with information as to what the rate means. If the rate is 95 percent or above and the comprehension level is good, it is recommended that the child read a more difficult passage. If it is within an instructional range, then, with a click of a button, a list of level-appropriate books is displayed. If the accuracy rate is below 90 percent, the assessor is advised to have the child read a less difficult passage.
Determining the Reading Level of Books
There are several popular systems available to level books -- that is, to determine their reading level. Reading Recovery, an early intervention program for at-risk first-grade children developed by Marie Clay, has leveled thousands of books using a numbering system (which does not correlate to grade levels or readability formulas). A texts difficulty is determined according to a number of factors that support the development of the reading process. The Reading Recovery Book List 2000 can be purchased online from the Reading Recovery Council of North America in either English or Spanish. Or, go to www.Leveledbooks.com, a searchable Web site that features more than 1,000 titles leveled according to Reading Recovery criteria. (Note that the site is operated by The Learning Collection, a company that sells the books listed.)
In Matching Books to Readers, Fountas and Pinnell (1999) describe their leveling system, which is similar to that of Reading Recovery but uses letters rather than numbers to designate difficulty. Their listing includes higher grades and thousands more books than does the Reading Recovery publication.
Readability formulas are also commonly used to determine text difficulty based on word and sentence complexity. Unlike leveling systems, however, they do not take into consideration important information such as how well the text is written, whether its layout, design, and organization are appropriate, and whether it makes sense or is interesting, has picture support, relates to the students prior knowledge of the topic, and includes charts or graphs. There are many readability formulas currently available, including the Fry readability graph, available at Kathy Schrocks Guide for Educators (housed at Discoveryschool.com), the Gunning Fog Index, and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level score and Flesch Reading Ease score (both of which can be accessed from current versions of Microsoft Word).
Several companies have developed computerized K-12 reading management systems that level books. The Accelerated Reader from Advantage Learning Systems (Topping, 1999 [online document]; Labbo, 1999 [online document]) currently has 35,000 titles, and Scholastics Reading Counts! has 25,000. Both systems use readability formulas to determine reading levels of books and online assessment to determine the level a child should begin reading. Once a child has read a book, he takes a computerized multiple-choice comprehension quiz and is awarded points based on the number of correct answers. The number of points possible is determined by the books reading level and number of words. Though both programs are quite expensive, they are widely used and have been touted for their ability to motivate children to read.
Book Adventure is a free online version of a reading management system developed by the Sylvan Learning Foundation (and whose educational advisory board members include the International Reading Association, publisher of this e-journal). With the help of cartoon character Baily Bookmark, children respond to a series of questions in order to find a book that is just right for them. Children enter their grade level, what level they would like to read (by grade level, easier books, books that are a challenge, or any level), what genre they prefer (fiction or nonfiction), and their areas of interest. The computer then generates a list of up to 100 books that meet the specified criteria from a database of approximately 10,000 titles. The students take multiple-choice quizzes on the books theyve read offline and earn points and prizes (restaurant gift certificates, balloons, etc., donated by sponsors) for their literary successes. There are also printable activity pages, bookmarks, badges, and certificates.
Other online sources that provide lists of books by grade level include the following:
Ensuring Access to Books
If I were required to establish guidelines for quantity, I would recommend at least 500 different books in every classroom with those split about evenly between narratives and informational books.... (Allington, 2001, p. 55)
Teachers often have access only to the designated basal reader, textbook, or trade book sets for their grade, so it is difficult to know how to provide children with access to 500 -- or even 100 -- different books. The school library can provide support, but their collections are often inadequate (Allington, 2001). In some schools, teachers collect books in a central location for shared use, avoiding duplication from room to room and thereby maximizing resources.
Electronic books (e-books), talking books, and books on compact disc (CD-ROM) provide another source of reading material for children. They are usually interactive, interesting, and motivating. They also have components not available in traditional books and can provide support for at-risk learners. For example, e-books might offer scaffolding that consists of the actual text plus supplementary information selected to provide assistance and increase comprehension (Anderson-Inman & Horney, 1999; online document). Such supplementary information might come in the form of graphics, video, and sound. Scaffolding for second-language learners might include synonyms for words or an explanation of new vocabulary in the learners primary language, and explanations of culturally specific references (Matthews, 2000; online document).
Project LITT: Literacy Instruction Through Technology, based at San Diego State University and funded through the U.S. Department of Education, focuses on the use of technology to improve the reading skills of students with learning disabilities. This research project is concerned with the effectiveness of electronic books for these students and its Web site includes software profiles for more than 200 talking storybook programs. Each profile includes publication information, publishers recommended age or grade level, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level for the print book (if available), on-screen story with Flesch-Kincaid level, story summary, story interaction modes, text interactivity rating, graphics interactivity rating, amount of animation in the program, and description navigation and other features.
There are many excellent CD-ROMS with leveled stories easily accessible to children. But, if lack of money is the main reason there are not enough books in the classroom, purchasing such electronic resources will not be an option. A viable alternative might be electronic books on the Internet, though these texts have limitations:
Although including supportive media is commonplace for electronic books distributed on CD-ROM, distributors of electronic books on the web have been slower to adopt these features. This can be attributed to the limitations of available web browsers and the need for additional software to access some types of multimedia enhancements. (Anderson-Inman & Horney, 1999)
According to Krieger (1998; online document), there may be as many as 20,000 complete books on the Web, though the majority offer text with few or no supportive resources. But there are several online e-books that include graphics and audio components, including the following:
Conclusion
Internet resources can assist us in meeting the needs of struggling readers with just right books. In a recent article, Leu (2001, online document) reminds us that
Often the best place to quickly obtain useful information is the Internet. Organizations that fail to enact these changes do not survive in a world in which change is rapid and continuous. To remain static is to become obsolete. This principle also applies to schools.
Each person within the literacy community must begin now to integrate the Internet into her or his work, to support the learning of all. As more educators enter into the world of the Internet, more insights will be brought to critical issues of instructional practice.
References
Allington, R.L. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Back (1st to 3rd citations) | (subsequent citations)
Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. (1999, April). Electronic books: Reading and studying with supportive resources. Reading Online. Available: http://www.readingonline.org/electronic/elec_index.asp?HREF=ebook/index.html
Back
Fountas, I., & Pinnell, G. (1999). Matching books to readers: Using leveled books in guided reading, K-3. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Back
Krieger, D. (1998, March-April). Bibliophiles of the world, unite! A 21st-century spin on the fabled library of Alexandria. Networker, 8(4). Available: http://www.usc.edu/isd/publications/Networker/97-98/Mar_Apr_98/feature-bibliophile.html
Back
Labbo, L.D. (1999, November). Questions worth asking about The Accelerated Reader: A response to Topping. Reading Online. Available: http://www.readingonline.org/past/past_index.asp?HREF=/critical/labbo/index.html
Back
Leu, D.J., Jr. (2001, March). Internet project: Preparing students for new literacies in a global village [Exploring Literacy on the Internet department]. Reading Teacher, 54(6). Available:
< HREF="../../RT/3-01_Column/">www.readingonline.org/electronic/elec_index.asp?HREF=/electronic/RT/3-01_Column/index.html
Back
Matthews, M.S. (2000, May). Electronic literacy and the limited English proficient student. Reading Online. Available: http://www.readingonline.org/electronic/elec_index.asp?HREF=matthews/index.html
Back
Strickland, D.S., & Rath, L.K. (2000, August). Between the Lions: Public television promotes early literacy. Reading Online, 4(2). Available:
http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=/articles/strickland/index.html
Back
Topping, K. (1999, November). Formative assessment of reading comprehension by computer: Advantages and disadvantages of The Accelerated Reader software. Reading Online. Available: http://www.readingonline.org/past/past_index.asp?HREF=/critical/topping/index.html
Back
About the Author
![]() |
Denise Johnson is an assistant professor of reading education at the College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virigina, USA. She received her Ed.D. in reading from the University of Memphis, Tennessee. She has worked as an elementary classroom teacher, a middle school reading specialist, and a Reading Recovery teacher. She now teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in literacy education and conducts research on the integration of technology into preservice and inservice education courses and within elementary classrooms. Her articles on literacy and technology have been published in a variety of journals and she is active in several professional organizations. She enjoys traveling with her family and reading to her son, Derek. Contact her by e-mail at cdjohn@wm.edu. |
For an index of Electronic Classroom Web Watches, click here. To print this Web Watch, point and click your mouse anywhere on the article's text; then use your browser's print command.
Citation: Johnson, D. (2001, April). Web watch: Internet resources to assist teachers with struggling readers. Reading Online, 4(9). Available: http://www.readingonline.org/electronic/elec_index.asp?HREF=/electronic/webwatch/struggling/index.html
Reading Online, www.readingonline.org
Posted April 2001
© 2001 International Reading Association, Inc. ISSN 1096-1232